<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">We’re not on there because as of yet – we’ve been dual stacking – so we aren’t using transition mechanisms – and we’re still evaluating which mechanism we will end up with.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">At the moment it is leaning towards ds-lite though because of compatibility with CPE’s – but we’re still testing on the V6 only stuff – I suspect to have a lot more to say about this in the next
2 weeks though<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Andrew<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> afnog <afnog-bounces@afnog.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Willy MANGA<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 03 December 2018 12:12<br>
<b>To:</b> Philip Paeps <philip@trouble.is><br>
<b>Cc:</b> afnog@afnog.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [afnog] IPv6 transition mechanism used by ISP<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hello Philip,<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 03/12/2018 à 08:49, Philip Paeps a écrit :<br>
> On 2018-12-03 05:47:40 (+0100), Diarmuid O Briain wrote:<br>
>> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:04:10 +0200<br>
>>> From: Yannis Nikolopoulos <<a href="mailto:dez@otenet.gr">dez@otenet.gr</a>><br>
>>> this probably hasn't been posted here so for everyone's info, there's a<br>
>>> google spreadsheet created by IETF's Lee Howard, with information about<br>
>>> transition mechanisms used by ISPs around the world. Obviously, anyone<br>
>>> can edit and the more people add info, the more meaningful and useful it<br>
>>> can become<br>
>>><br>
>>> <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK9vcVApc/edit?usp=sharing">
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK9vcVApc/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> I don't see any East African ISPs listed on the transition mechanism<br>
>> list.<br>
<br>
It's a work in progress. Remember that the author suggest people to add<br>
their own experiences.<br>
<br>
<br>
>> Does that mean ISPs in the region are not considering an IPv6 transition<br>
>> plan?<br>
<br>
No.. There are some players in AFRICA involved in IPv6 deployement.<br>
Hopefully more will follow. (crossing fingers)<br>
<br>
<br>
> I think it means East African ISPs have not added any information to the<br>
> list.<br>
> <br>
> Possibly because they didn't know about the list until now.<br>
> <br>
> Perhaps you can add some information?<br>
<br>
Indeed; that's the purpose.<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Willy Manga<br>
@ongolaboy<br>
<a href="https://ongola.blogspot.com/">https://ongola.blogspot.com/</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>