<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EstiloCorreo18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EstiloCorreo19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EstiloCorreo20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EstiloCorreo21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=ES link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Is the ISPs that enable IPv6 the ones that should update the CPE, unless is owned by the user, of course …</span><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> but in different countries, this works different ways.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>De: </span></b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu><br><b>Fecha: </b>lunes, 3 de diciembre de 2018, 10:59<br><b>Para: </b>JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, Diarmuid O Briain <diarmuid@obriain.com>, UIXP Techies <techies@uixp.co.ug>, <afnog@afnog.org><br><b>Asunto: </b>Re: [afnog] IPv6 transition mechanism used by ISP<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:35.4pt'>On 3/Dec/18 11:48, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Android and Windows support since several years ago.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>In Apple phones is not needed because they mandate the support of IPv6 in apps. You only have the problem of tethering, but Apple has implemented the CLAT as well for tethering a few months ago (last iOS release).</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Windows 10 supports it as well. This is not so important because the most important path for 464XLAT is broadband networks is the CPE.</span><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><br>Good to hear - probably why 99% of things worked well during ZAPF.<br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>The document I mention before is precisely to ensure that CPEs support it.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>If you CPE doesn’t, just reflash it with OpenWRT, and you’re done!</span><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><br>Easy for you and me, yes. <br><br>Granny down the road just wants her MTV :-).<br><br>The CPE has always been the weakest link. There seems to be some mention of Mikrotik supporting 464XLAT, but the URL with that blog is dead. I've had a Mikrotik hAP Lite CPE for my FTTH service at my house since 2016. It's quite regularly updated (at least once a month) compared to when I had a Netgear, Linksys or Calix CPE. And Grandma won't need to flash it with whatever...<br><br>There are probably other CPE vendors that don't feel the only way to update your device is by walking into the store a year later to buy a new one, and perhaps the solution lies in those... those that have a decent product that can easily be rolled out, and will continue to receive updates as and when.<br><br>Mark.<br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><br>**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
http://www.theipv6company.com<br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>
<br>
</body></html>